Brindle and Ince

Director of MNA (no slouch at all)

has explained and endorsed and participated in

racial segregation for trauma-informed worship .

A guy (no jerk at all)

meekly and minimally mis-step-ed,

when he addressed it in the business meeting.

The moderator (no fool at all)

was careful to remove possible stank,

without displacing or disqualifying the speaker.

The rules (no surprise at all)

include time limits, easily extendable,

if the assembled court wanted the point addressed.

The PCA (handsome is as handsome does)

voted NOT to extend the time for speaker and topic,

and decided NOT to address the public problem.

Has the brother (elected again)

renounced and repented from racial wrangling,

manfully and easily resolving the entire spasm?

Are critics (perched on molehills)

entitled to opprobrium and details,

when mountain climbers insist all is on the level?